as beginning with an adversary sendingAttack.Phishingan email to a target ’ s Gmail account . The email typically will originate from someone on the recipient ’ s contact list whose own account had previously been compromised . The email comes with a subject header and a screenshot or image of an attachment that the sender has used in a recent communication with the recipient . When the recipient clicks on the image , a new tab opens with a prompt asking the user to sign into Gmail again . The fully functional phishing page is designed to look exactly likeAttack.PhishingGoogle ’ s page for signing into Gmail . The address bar for the page includes mention of accounts.google.com , leading unwary users to believe the page is harmless , Wordfence CEO Mark Maunder wrote . `` Once you complete sign-in , your account has been compromised , '' he said . In reality , the fake login page that opens upAttack.Phishingwhen a user clicks on the image is actually an inline file created using a scheme called Data URI . When users enter their Gmail username and password on the page , the data is sent to the attacker . The speed at which the attackers sign into a compromised account suggest that the process may be automated , or that they may have a team standing by to access accounts as they get compromised . `` Once they have access to your account , the attacker also has full access to all your emails including sent and received at this point and may download the whole lot , '' Maunder said . What makes the phishing technique dangerous is the way the address bar displaysAttack.Phishinginformation when users click on the screenshot of the attachment , he told Dark Reading . In this case , by including the correct host name and “ https// ” in the address bar , the attackers appear to beAttack.Phishinghaving more success foolingAttack.Phishingvictims into entering their credential data on the fake Gmail login page , he says . Instead , all of the content in the address bar is of the same color and is designed to convince users that the site is harmless . `` If you aren ’ t paying close attention , you will ignore the ‘ data : text/html ’ preamble and assume the URL is safe . '' Google said in a statement that it 's working on mitigations to such an attack . `` We 're aware of this issue and continue to strengthen our defenses against it , '' Google said . `` We help protect users from phishing attacksAttack.Phishingin a variety of ways , including : machine learning based detection of phishing messages , Safe Browsing warnings that notify users of dangerous links in emails and browsers , preventing suspicious account sign-ins , and more . Users can also activate two-step verification for additional account protection . '' Users can also mitigate the risk of their accounts being compromised via phishingAttack.Phishingby enabling two-factor authentication . `` What makes this unique is the fact that none of the traditional browser indicators that would identify a possible fraudulent site are present , '' says Robert Capps , vice president of business development at NuData Security . The attack underscores the need for Web browser makers to rethink the trust signals they use to inform users about a danger webpage or exploit . `` How users interpret these signals should be thoroughly understood , '' he says . `` Entraining users to rely on signals may have unintended consequences that attackers can use to exploit customers .